The blog of one new teacher, fumbling through theory and practice-someone is learning something here.
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
Skype - A Response
I like the frank discussion of the issues associated with the tool. Limitations are just as important as the potential for us to understand when and how to use skype and it really reinforced the idea that the task, not the tool comes first. Understanding the limitations of a tool helps us find the tool that fits well in our school environment for our task.
Wish: More interaction perhaps?What might have been really awesome is to skype with someone in class. Show us something authentic rather than videos of it. That really the only thing I wished for.
iPads in the classroom - A Response
My response to the presentation this morning....
Stars: Really fantastic depth for different, cutting edge uses for a tablet! The augmented reality portion in particular was interesting, allowing students to interact with their environment in a totally new way.
I also liked the little moment to go out and find interesting apps-So that we were up to something to directly relate your presentation to our particular area of interest.
Wish: You acknowledged the structure that these presentations have been taking, (everyone of these has a video!), but then followed that same structure anyways! I wish that along with that admission, was an acknowledgement that either that structure was what works best for us-Or find a different thing to do for those five minutes!
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
My response to today's UDL presenation
By looking at technology from a UDL perspective, it seems that you really have to ask yourself the hard questions of 'How is this technology enhancing my lesson and my student's experience?' Swapping out an overhead projector for a powerpoint presentation doesn't make the cut because it really doesn't give multiple means of expression or multiple means of representation.
I loved the inclusion of robotics in UDL, it really is the cutting edge and brings up some really interesting ideas about what it means to be a distance verses a physically present learner. I also really loved the acknowledgement of what I've heard called, partial continuous attention, the multitasking that has become a part of being a technology immersed individual. While the presentation was going on, I was replying to another email, exploring the UDL site and only occasionally staring at the screen. Rather than seeing that as an indicator of poor attention, it was an expression of further interest in the topic, or perhaps just a symptom of being a busy student/teacher.
My wish would have been a different format. If you're an expert in UDL, why were we given only visual/auditory means of representation? Although I acknowledge that it would be a tall order to do that in a 30 minute time frame.